தமிழ்
Astrology
Classifieds
Cricket
Movies
சினிமா
Education
Health
Hotels
IT
Maps
BSE/NSE Live
Music
News
City 360
Shopping
Tamil Songs
Videos
Air Fares
Friendship
Jobs
Kalyanam
Property
e-paper
  Editorial
  Site Web Yahoo! India Search
 
 

   Chennai Features
   Restaurants
   Trends
   Nanganallur Notes
   Vini's Corner
   Lighter Side of Life
   Places of Worship
   Places of Interest
   Down Memory Lane
   Reminiscences
   Free Classifieds
Chennaionline EDITORIAL

The Chennai Motorcycle Race

An unseasonal Motorcycle race is on in Chennai. The two teams are the TVS and the Bajaj. It is anybody’s guess as to who will eventually win.

Bajaj Auto says it owns the twin plug engine technology. TVS Motor Company is of the view that the use of twin spark plugs in an engine of a small bore size cannot be an inventive step. The case went to the Court.

NanganallurNotes:Who got the POWER!!
VinisCorner: Starbucks Magic
Kumarkom: A Trip to the Mallu Land
Diagnosis and Management of Asthma
Mamooty-Sneha : Aruvadai
Remembering Ariyakudi
COL Videos : Lakshana Art Exhibition 1
COL Times - Sonia, Tata among world`s most influential: Time
தசாவதாரம் பற்றிய சில தகவல்கள்
மூன்றாவது பல் முளைப்பு
சாம்பன் பதில்கள் - 41

The Madras High Court has restrained the TVS from launching its much publicized 125 cc Flame motorcycle with the twin spark plug engine technology. According to the Court, Bajaj enjoyed the right of exclusive usage of the patented technology. There is novelty, which means an invention and the same has been registered under the Patents Act, says the Court. According to Justice P Jothimani, novelty has been, on the face of it proved by Bajaj by marketing the product in such large extent and also without objection fairly for long. The Judge took the view that when a petition for revocation of a patent, already granted, is filed it cannot be said that the patent validly granted should not be presumed to be suspicious.

The issues involved are complex. Naturally, these cannot be resolved at the preliminary stage of the trial. Incidentally, TVS has used a third valve in its engine. The question is whether this has any material impact. Bajaj says it has no impact whatsoever.

Another substantial issue is that Bajaj applied for the patent in 2002, whereas TVS has sought its revocation only in 2007. The present suit was filed by Bajaj.

What are the options before TVS now? They would naturally go on appeal challenging this order. The Supreme Court will have the final say. Secondly, TVS may have an alternate engine ready for the Flame. Or, they may as well drop the project, which has become much more than a spark.

H Ramakrishnan
More Articles Published on Feb 19th, 2008


Recommend this page

Mail us your feedback

No comments posted.
BSE/NSE Live
Movies, cricket, politics or
breaking news
@ your desktop RSS/XML

Hot New Jobs.Apply Now
Properties on Sale and Rent
Real Estate In India
Horoscope with 10 Year's Prediction

Copyright © 2008, Chennai Interactive Business Services (P) Ltd. All rights reserved.
cibs@chennaionline.com - Copyright and Disclaimer - Privacy Policy